RONULO Versus. Individuals
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Chapel out of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. Yet not, on the day of one’s wedding, new heading officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, would not solemnize the wedding abreast of understanding the couples hit a brick wall so you’re able to safe a marriage license. As good recourse, Joey, who was up coming sporting barong tagalong, and Claire, clothed when you look at the a married relationship gown, along with their mothers, sponsors and you will site visitors, proceeded toward Separate Chapel off Filipino Christians, called the newest Aglipayan Chapel. They questioned the petitioner, an enthusiastic Aglipayan priest, to perform a ceremony to which aforementioned decided even with become informed from the couple they’d no marriage certificate.
The fresh new petitioner wishing his choir and you can arranged a bulk on pair on a single day. The guy used the latest service about visibility of bridegroom, new bride-to-be, the mothers, the principal and you will secondary sponsors and the rest of the desired subscribers.
The fresh prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and you will Mary Anne Yere, testified for the situations of your own ceremony. Joseph are this new veil recruit when you find yourself Mary Anne was the fresh new wire sponsor throughout the wedding. Mary Anne testified one she noticed the brand new fiance walk-down the fresh section. She including spotted the happy couple change their marriage Tacoma free hookup rings, kiss one another, and indication a file. She read the fresh new petitioner training the primary sponsors so you’re able to sign the brand new matrimony bargain. Afterwards, it went to the brand new lobby, got food and you can took images. She watched new petitioner there. She in addition to understood the marriage invitation supplied to the lady from the Joey.
Fl Umadac, the mother off Joey, affirmed you to she heard the couple claim during the ceremony that it get each other given that couple. Mariano Roentgen. Nalupta Jr. in which she got a certificate that no wedding license is actually awarded into couple.
The latest petitioner, while you are admitting he used a ceremony, refuted one their operate out of blessing the couple try tantamount so you’re able to good solemnization of your own relationships while the contemplated by-law.
ISSUE: Claimed the fresh petitioner is accountable for violating Blog post 352 of the Modified Penal Code (RPC) to possess presumably undertaking an illegal marriage service.
Months following the relationships, she visited the newest municipal local civil registrar regarding San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte with Atty
RATIO: Petitioner presented an illegal marriage ceremony. The brand new offense as delivered to in the Art 352 of your own RPC is the efficiency from ily Code and that reads:
(3) A married relationship ceremony which will take lay into the look of the employing people before the solemnizing officer in addition to their private report you to definitely it get one another while the wife and husband regarding the presence out of not less than a couple witnesses off courtroom ages.
Artwork. 6. Zero prescribed function otherwise religious rite into the solemnization of your wedding is required. It shall be requisite, however, on contracting activities to seem individually before solemnizing administrator and you may state regarding the visibility out-of for around a couple witnesses regarding court ages which they capture each other once the partner and you may wife. This declaration should be contained in the relationships certificate which will become closed because of the employing parties in addition to their witnesses and you can attested because of the solemnizing manager.
This new Ultimate Judge informed me you to what made the fresh petitioner’s work good wedding ceremony and not just just true blessing was you to if you find yourself there is no recommended setting otherwise spiritual rite, all of that is actually called for is actually “into the contracting events to seem personally up until the solemnizing officer and you may declare throughout the exposure from for around a few witnesses off legal decades that they bring each other as partner and you will wife.”
As to the very first demands, the petitioner accepted your events searched prior to your and therefore fact was testified to help you by the witnesses. On the second demands, we find you to definitely, contrary to the petitioner’s allegation, the newest prosecution has proven, from testimony regarding witnesses, the contracting parties actually announced that they grab each other given that couple. Therefore, it’s obvious one to petitioner used a married relationship ceremony and not just blessing.